<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://test.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Wiretapping</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/taxonomy/term/12/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>House of the German Pirate Party spokesman raided by Police</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.18/german-pirate-party-raided</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Bavarian Police searched the house of the German Pirate Party spokesman
on the 11 September 2008, searching for information on some leaked plans
regarding a Skype wire tap project, that were published by the Party.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Pirate Party published some documents received from an anonymous
whistleblower that show the Bavarian government plans to develop a Trojan
horse able to eavesdrop on Skype conversations. Police wanted to find out
the source of that information and they searched the house of the spokesman
and took away a server, but this was fully encrypted, so there are little
chances to discover the source.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The search seems to be related to the two documents leaked on January 2008
that were present on the Internet and then posted on Wikileaks website. The
first document is a communication by the Bavarian Ministry of Justice to the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:17:11 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Serbian Telecom Agency publishes Internet traffic interception rules</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.15/serbian-telecom-traffic-interception</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1072&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Serbia&#039;s Republic Agency for Telecommunications (RATEL) published on 21 July
2008 a document of Instructions for Technical Requirements for Subsystems,
Devices, Hardware and Installation of Internet Networks. The document
explains the technical requirements for authorized monitoring of some
telecom services and provides a list of obligations for the telecom
operators.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According with the present text, the ISPs will have to let the police access
their databases, including users&#039; e-mail content or browsing history. This
regulation seems to be the Serbian version of the data retention directive,
since the scope is defined as fighting cyber crime and terrorism.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Danica Radovanovic explains on his blog at GlobalVoices what are the present
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:33:45 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FRA has a long history of spying on Swedes</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.15/fra-spying-swedes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1070&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Swedish National Defence Radio Establishment FRA that has made the
headlines last month with its law on spying on all communication, has
recently announced that it has reported a blogger to the Chancellor of
Justice for distributing what they consider classified material proving
the Agency was spying on Swedes starting with 1996.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Henrik Alexandersson is the name of the blogger that criticized the new FRA
surveillance law. He published two lists of FRA&#039;s alleged
classified material on his blog. The first document is a list of 103 Swedish
citizens that were under surveillance in the early 90&#039;s for having contacts
with Russia. The other publication is a list of connections between Russian
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:19 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Liberty groups win long court battle against UK wiretapping</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/liberty-ireland-uk-wiretapping</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1052&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After nine years of legal battle by civil rights groups in London and
Dublin, the European Court of Human Rights ruled on 1 July 2008 that UK
Government had violated Human Rights by tapping their communications
between 1990 and 1997.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Liberty groups, along with British Irish Rights Watch and the Irish Council
for Civil Liberties, have claimed their communications were subject to
indiscriminate surveillance by MoD&#039;s Electronic Test Facility that had
eavesdropped on their phone, fax, email and data communications between 1990
and 1997.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After having first lodged complaints with the UK&#039;s Interception of
Communications Tribunal, the DPP and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:58:42 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Sweden is listening to all internet and phone conversations</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.13/sweden-fra-adoption</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1036&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In Denmark we already have Data Retention in place and the rest of
Europe will follow soon. That means that our own countries demand that
Internet companies and phone companies log who we phone, email with,
chat with, which websites we visit, etc. This is something that the
IT-Political Associations of Denmark (IT-Pol) fights against.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sweden has now taken one more step towards the complete surveillance of
its citizens as well as citizens of the rest of the world.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Swedish Parliament (Riksdagen) passed a law that instructs all
telephone and Internet operators to deliver a copy of all phone and
Internet communication crossing Swedish borders to the Swedish
intelligence service FRA. FRA will then use a big spying network and one
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:58:56 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Deutsche Telekom under investigation for spying on its employees</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.11/deutsche-telekom-spying-employees</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1007&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The giant German telecommunication company is under investigation by
national prosecutors for a presumed breach of privacy, after having spied on
the phone calls of its managers, journalists and even board members.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to Der Spiegel newspaper, the former monopoly incumbent operator -
still 31.7% owned by the German government - illegally monitored the phone
calls of parts of its staff during 2005-2006 when the company was laying off
workers. It seems the company hired an outside agency to monitor contacts
between members of its supervisory board and journalists.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The company has partially admitted the allegations saying the monitoring was
carried out to find out who was leaking information to the press. Rene
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:57:55 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German Intelligence caught spying on journalist&#039;s emails</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.9/german-intelligence-emails</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/984&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The German Federal Intelligence Service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND),
has been recently under pressure for having illicitly monitored the e-mails
between Spiegel correspondent Susanne Koelbl and Afghanistan&#039;s Commerce
Minister Amin Farhang.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The German parliamentary commission in charge with investigating the
activities of the secret services (PKG) criticised BND, believing the agency
had been compromised by this case that it considered &amp;quot;a grave breach of
basic rights&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;The trust between the PKG and the leadership of the BND has
been violated by this,&amp;quot; stated PKG. The commission also considered it
unacceptable that Uhrlau, the BND president, had not informed the German
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:43:14 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Germany: New basic right to privacy of computer systems</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.4/germany-constitutional-searches</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/883&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The German Constitutional Court published on 27 February  2008 a landmark
ruling about the constitutionality of secret online searches of computers by
government agencies. The decision constitutes a new &amp;quot;basic right to the
confidentiality and integrity of information-technological systems&amp;quot; as
derived from the German Constitution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The journalist and privacy activist Bettina Winsemann, the politician
Fabian Brettel (Left Party), the lawyer and former federal minister for
the interior Gerhart Baum (Liberal Party), and the lawyers Julius Reiter
and Peter Schantz had challenged the constitutionality of a December 2006
amendmend to the law about the domestic intelligence service of the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Key privacy concerns in Romania 2007</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/privacy-romania-2007</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/848&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Privacy and data protection seems not to be a hot topic for the Romanian
society. The media is generally ignoring the topic, unless something related
to an important public figure is making the subject out of the ordinary. The
Romanian Data Protection Authority has failed in becoming a privacy public
supporter and has rather emerged as a data protection controller&#039;s register.
Under these general circumstances, 2007 was rather a calm year, where the
main success of the government in the field of privacy - the non-adoption of
the data retention law - was obtained by mistake only due to bureaucratic
reasons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
a. Data retention
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The first draft of the data retention law that needs to implement the EU
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US law threatens non-US citizens&#039; privacy rights</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number5.16/us-law-privacy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/606&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act proposed by the US Administration
was passed by the US Congress on 4 August 2007 allowing US intelligence
services to intercept electronic communications between US, but also non-US
citizens, if the communication passes across US-based networks, without
needing a court order.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A written question was addressed to the European Commission and the Council
by MEP Sophie In&#039;t Veld and Graham Watson from ALDE (Liberal group in the
European Parliament) raising concerns on the US act which they consider as a
violation of the privacy and civil rights of EU citizens. The questions
refer to the level of protection of the EU citizens&#039; personal data that the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:54:30 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Slovenian intelligence agency scandal</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number5.11/slovenia-intelligence-agency</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/520&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Slovenian intelligence agency (SOVA) is monitoring telecommunications
in the Balkans in cooperation with German BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst) and
UK&#039;s MI5. Some believe that the recently disclosed secret location in the
Slovenian capital could be a part of Echelon.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Slovenian intelligence agency is currently a part of a political scandal
which has revealed some secret locations and methods that SOVA was using for
intelligence purposes. Moreover, international credibility in SOVA and
its agents is compromised, as the Slovenian press managed to obtain
classified information regarding SOVA&#039;s secret financing, its company of
straw and its international cooperation with other intelligence agencies.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:35:02 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Data retention and increased surveillance in Germany</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number5.8/germany-data-retention</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/461&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The German government has approved the draft legislation that implements the
data retention directive, but the political opposition and the growing
anti-surveillance movement shows an important resistance to the new plans of
the federal Minister for the interior, Wolfgang Schäuble, who wants an ever
increased surveillance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The draft bill adopted by the German Government on 18 April 2007, was called
by the Minister of Justice, Brigitte Zypries, &amp;quot;reasonable and
constitutional.&amp;quot; But the adopted draft expands what was initially
proposed by Zypres, making traffic data accessible not only for criminal
prosecution purposes, but also in order to &amp;quot;prevent considerable dangers&amp;quot;
and &amp;quot;fulfil the legal duties&amp;quot; of all security police. Zypries also stated
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:39:17 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Monitoring employee&#039;s Internet breaches human rights, says ECHR</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number5.7/echr-monitor-internet</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/447&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Welsh Government, through Carmarthenshire College, was found in breach
of human rights by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for having
monitored one of the college employee&#039;s e-mails, internet traffic and
telephone calls.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the College is publicly funded, Lynette Copland sued the government for
infringing Art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights that says
&amp;quot;everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home
and his correspondence&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The government argued that the monitoring was carried out in order to
establish whether Copland had extensively used college resources for
personal communication, but the court ruled that: &amp;quot;The court is not
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:20:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cross-border wiretapping proposed by the Swedish Government</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number5.5/sweden-wiretapping</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/424&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mikael Odenberg, the Swedish defence minister presented on 8 March 2007 a
draft law to the parliament that would give the national defence
intelligence agency the power to monitor all cross-border phone calls and
email traffic without court order.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The proposal, which according to the government, is meant to combat
terrorism and other threats to national security, would allow the National
Defence Radio Establishment (FRA) to use computer software to search for
sensitive keywords in all cross-border phone and e-mail communications.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Although the Government states that this would affect only a small part of
the electronic communications and that communication exchanged between
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wiretapping scandal in Greece ends with record fine</title>
 <link>http://test.edri.org/edrigram/number4.24/greece-wiretapping</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/357&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As a result of the scandal related to the wiretapping of phone conversations
of several Greek officials, including Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis,
during the period August 2004 – March 2005, Vodafone was fined by the Greek
privacy committee for not having protected its network against hacking
activities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Greek Prime Minister, other ministers, top military officials, human
rights activists, the police, army and intelligence heads, journalists and
lawyers were illegally monitored for almost a year by unknown hackers
through the Vodafone network. The action was discovered in March 2005 but
the hackers behind the wiretapping have not been discovered.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Vodafone was blamed by the Hellenic Authority for the Information and
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://test.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

